Results Matching the Nathaniel DNA Profile

Footnotes:

1) There were two individuals named William Seeley who are not definitively placed in the Seeley lineage.  These two Williams fit in one of these lineages (the numbers are the SGS numbers assigned for each person):

First Line: Obadiah 4, Jonas 19, Ebenezer 63, Nathaniel 189, Samuel 501, William 1692
 or
Second Line: Obadiah 4, Jonas 19, Samuel 59, Joseph 182, Samuel 467, William 1595.

2) Values from the first SGS DNA project, data from Oxford Ancestors.

3) Values from the first SGS DNA project, data from Family Tree DNA.

4) Data from the study conducted by the Sorenson Molecular Genetics Foundation.  The values are from an anonymous descendant of Don Carlos SEELY, b. 4 Jan 1846, Nashville, Lee Co., IA [died about Dec 1900 in or around Castle Dale, Emery Co., UT.

5) SGS member descended from John Byron Seeley, born in Malaquanatch, Island of Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, Canada, December 5, 1843, died Nov. 8, 1926 in Olympia, WA.  John B. Seeley was a son of Austin Seeley, born in MA, died before 1860, and Lucy Vaughn, born about 1818 in Canada, died after 1880.  Lucy was living widowed in Princeton, Bureau Co., IL in 1860.  By 1870 Lucy had remarried to Nathan E. Prout and was living in Johnson Co., IA.  She and Nathan were still living there in 1880.  The DNA testing was done by FamilyTreeDNA.

6) SGS member descended from Ezra D. Seeley, born 1797/99 in either Canada or Vermont.  Ezra died on 19 Dec 1864 in Princeton, Mercer County, MO.  He married first, Susan Boyce, and second Eliza Jane Bradford.  He is not the same person as Ezra D. Seeley (SGS# ?865).

7) Data from the study conducted by the Sorenson Molecular Genetics Foundation.  The values are from an anonymous descendant of Artie J SEELY, born 20 Dec 1894, Mount Pleasant, Sanpete Co., UT;  died 27 Jun 1984, Cardston, Alberta, Canada.  Values for DYS459 a & b could not be determined from the SMGF online database.

8) Augustus Seeley was born in New England about 1739. He joined the New York Provincials in Queen's Co. N.Y. at age 19, listing his occupation as a hatter. He is listed again in the Muster Rolls in Albany Co in 1761. As a Loyalist he went to Upper Canada with Sir John Johnston, receiving land grants in Lancaster, Upper Canada, but settled in Elizabethtown, now Brockville Ontario. His parents have never been located.
      Augustus had two sons, James and Joseph and several daughters. His daughter Sarah married Hazard Wilcox Jr., they eventually went to Utah with the Pioneers. Two of their children, Clarissa Jane and John H. O. Wilcox married children of Justus Azel and Mehitable Seelye, Justus Azel Seelye Family Organization (JASFO). Many of the JASFO members descend from both Nathaniel, Seeley Genealogical Society SGS # 2 and Augustus Seeley, who is not listed in the SGS Books. His family is contained in the Seeley File.

9) Descendant of John B. Seeley, born 3 Jun 1835 in Niagara Co., NY; died 14 Jun 1903 in Prairie City, McDonough Co., IL.  Married Sarah Elizabeth Miller, who was born 23 1837 in Canada.

10) Descendant of Henry Seeley/Silley, born about 1833 in Fordingbridge, Hampshire, England.  Died about Sep 1895 in Rochdale, Lancashire, England.  Married Hannah Powell.

11) Descendant of Samuel Seelye, b. 6 Aug 1778, VT, d. 27 Apr 1854, Greenup, KY.  Samuel married, in Whitehall, NY in 1802, Electa Fuller, b. 19 Jun 1783 or 1785, d. 14 Apr 1871, OH.

12) Data from the study conducted by the Sorenson Molecular Genetics Foundation.  The values are from an anonymous descendant of Dean Winters Seeley born 31 Jan 1891 Indianola, Sanpete, Utah,died 31 Jul 1969 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, Utah; m. 25 Apr 1917, Margaret Luella Abegglen.

13) Data from the study conducted by the Sorenson Molecular Genetics Foundation.  The values are from an anonymous descendant of John Thomas Seely, b. 13 Oct 1887, Mt. Pleasant, UT; m. Mary Ellen Terkelsen.

14) Descendant of John Seeley, born 13 Aug 1751 (birthplace unknown), died 29 Apr 1825 in Middletown Twp., Monmouth Co., NJ.  Married 1st (abt 1773) Phoebe Truex/Truax, and 2nd (abt 1797) Hannah Dianna Yeomans.

15) Descendant of William Seeley (b. 1780 Waterbury CT?; d.  22 Sept 1854 Meriden, CT) m. Patty (possibly Clark) (b. 1777/1778 d. 1869, Waterbury CT).

16) Descendant of William A. Seeley (1778-1858) of Wells Township, Bradford County, PA.

17) Descendant of DeForest Bowen Seeley b. 20 Sep 1840 Wellsboro, Tioga Co, PA, d. 2 Nov 1903.  The 1900 census (Liberty Twp., Mitchell Co., IA) shows his parents born in NY.

18) Descendant of Isaac Joseph Seely (b. 25 Aug 1837 in Chester, Meigs Co., OH and his son Arta McLean Seely (b. 3 NOV 1874 in East Millcreek, Salt Lake County, UT).  Listed in the Seeley database as a descendant of Obadiah, but does not match the Obadiah or Nathaniel DNA profile.  The lineage given is Arta McLean (b.1874) - Isaac Joseph (b. 1837) - William Seely (b. 1816) - Jacob Seely (b. 1786) - John Nicholas (b. 1749) - Samuel (SGS#175, b. 1710) - Samuel (b. 1687) - Jonas (b. 1653) - Obadiah.

19) Descendant of Samuel Seeley of Venango Co., PA, born about 1770, possibly in Vermont.  Married Sarah (maiden name unknown).  Analysis by Ancestry DNA.

20) Descendant of Orange Seelye, born 1767, Justus W. Seelye 1745, Joseph Seelye 1714, John Seelye 1684, Benjamin Seeley1657, Nathaniel Seeley 1627, Robert Seeley 1602.  Testing done through DNA Heritage (actual testing done by the same company that did the testing for Relative Genetics, Sorenson Genomics).

21) Descendant of Samuel Seley, b. NY,  Married Charlotte Moore.  They lived in Cambridge, VT.  Analysis was dome by DNA Heritage.

22) Analysis was done by the DNA Heritage laboratory. Updated conversion factors supplied by the SMGF Lab results in no conversion factor applied to DYS394/19 resulting in a 35/37 match with the Obadiah profile. Earliest known ancestor was great-great grandfather Alfred Seely, b. Southport, NY, d. Wells, PA 1897, great grandfather Ethan b. ca 1862, d. 1966. Lived in Kansas.”

23) Analysis was done by the DNA Heritage laboratory. Updated conversion factors applied to match values recommended by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) results in no conversion factor applied to DYS394/19 resulting in a 36/37 match with the Nathaniel profile. Earliest known ancestor was grandfather Alfred E. Seeley, 1864-1954.

24) Analysis was done by the DNA Heritage laboratory. Updated conversion factors applied to match values recommended by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) resulted in no conversion factor applied to DYS394/19 producing a 37/37 match with the Nathaniel profile. Ancestors are: g-g-grandfather George Henry Seeley (1848-1938), g-grandfather George Lyman Seeley (1881-1953), and Grandfather George Robert Seeley (1911-1986).

25) Analysis was done by the DNA Heritage laboratory. Updated conversion factors applied to match values recommended by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) resulted in no conversion factor applied to DYS394/19 producing a 37/37 match with the Nathaniel profile. Ancestors are: g-g-grandfather Elanson Seely SGS#923 (1793-1866), g-grandfather Ebenezer Seely SGS#2549 1816-1895), and Grandfather Frank Adelbert Seely.

26) Analysis was done by the DNA Heritage laboratory. Updated conversion factors applied to match values recommended by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) resulted in no conversion factor applied to DYS394/19 producing a 37/37 match with the Nathaniel profile. Ancestors are: g-g-g-grandfather John Seeley, g-g-grandfather Justus Seeley (1840-1887) and g-grandfather Colin Seeley (1871-1955).

27) Analysis was done by the Family Tree DNA laboratory. Ancestors are: SGS#3733 Allen Seeley, Judson Delos Seeley (1851-1929), and great grandfather Lee Marcus Seeley (b. 1874). FTDNA does not test 11 of the markers in the Obadiah or Nathaniel profiles. Markers tested but not matching were DYS-437, DYS-464, and GATA H4. Because of the number of generations between Obadiah and the male tested, the male tested is considered a descendant of immigrant Obadiah Seeley with a match of 23 of 26 markers. Note that the markers identified in yellow (i.e., 385 (two components), 459 (2 components), and 464 (4 components) only count as one marker each.

© Seeley/Seelye/Seely Genealogical Society